{"id":"arxiv/2601.03802","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03802","tags":["cs.LG","quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Benchmark Study for Financial Prediction","domain":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv","authors":["Rehan Ahmad","Muhammad Kashif","Nouhaila Innan","Muhammad Shafique"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.LG","summary":"In this paper, we present a reproducible benchmarking framework that systematically compares QML models with architecture-matched classical counterparts across three financial tasks: (i) directional return prediction on U.S. and Turkish equities, (ii) live-trading simulation with Quantum LSTMs versus classical LSTMs on the S\\&P 500, and (iii) realized volatility forecasting using Quantum Support Vector Regression. By standardizing data splits, features, and evaluation metrics, our study provides a fair assessment of when current-generation QML models can match or exceed classical methods.…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-01-07","reactions":{}}