{"id":"arxiv/2602.10349","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10349","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Andrew T. Kamen","Samuel Fine","Bikrant Bhattacharyya","Frederic T. Chong","Andy J. Goldschmidt"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Control pulses that nominally optimize fidelity are sensitive to routine hardware drift and modeling errors. Robust quantum optimal control seeks error-insensitive control pulses that maintain fidelity thresholds and obey hardware constraints. Distinct numerical approximations to the first-order error susceptibility include adjoint end-point and toggling-frame approaches. Although theoretically equivalent, we provide a novel, systematic study demonstrating important numerical differences between these two approaches. We also introduce a critical discretization correction to the widely-used…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-02-10","reactions":{}}