{"id":"arxiv/2602.19042","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19042","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Quantum Error Correction and Dynamical Decoupling: Better Together or Apart?","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Victor Kasatkin","Mario Morford-Oberst","Arian Vezvaee","Daniel A. Lidar"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Quantum error correction/detection (QEC/QED) and dynamical decoupling (DD) are tools for protecting quantum information. A natural goal is to combine them to outperform either approach alone. Such a benefit is not automatic: physical DD can conflict with encoded subspace, and QEC performance is governed by the errors that survive decoding, not just those DD suppresses. We analyze a hybrid memory cycle where DD is implemented logically (LDD) using normalizer elements of an $[[n,k,d]]$ stabilizer code, followed by a round of syndrome measurement and recovery (or, in the detection setting,…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-02-22","reactions":{}}