{"id":"arxiv/2603.00662","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00662","tags":["cond-mat.str-el","cond-mat.mtrl-sci","physics.chem-ph","physics.comp-ph","quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"General linear correction method for DFT+X energy: application to U-M (M=Al, Ga, In) alloys under high pressure","domain":"cond-mat.str-el","source":"arxiv","authors":["X. L. Pan","H. X. Song","Y. Sun","F. C. Wu","H. Wang","Y. F. Wang","Y. Chen","X. R. Chen","Hua Y. Geng"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cond-mat.str-el","summary":"DFT+X methods, such as DFT+U and DFT+DMFT, are important supplements to standard density functional theory when strong on-site Coulomb interactions are present. However, the involvement of external parameters in the underlying model Hamiltonian introduces intrinsic ambiguity when comparing the total energies obtained with different model parameters. This renders DFT+X approaches semi-empirical and severely hinders their capability to describe phase ordering and phase stability, especially when reliable experimental benchmarks are unavailable, such as under high pressure. In this work, we…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-02-28","reactions":{}}