{"id":"arxiv/2603.13066","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13066","tags":["math.LO"],"score":0,"title":"In Defence of the Material Conditional","domain":"math.LO","source":"arxiv","authors":["Alexander V. Gheorghiu"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.LO","summary":"The material conditional has long been charged with paradox. Defined truth-functionally, it renders true any conditional whose antecedent is false or consequent true -- hence, seemingly absurd statements such as `If unicorns exist, then $2+2=4$'. This has been taken as proof that the connective cannot capture the meaning of ordinary if-then sentences, which appear to imply a causal or evidential link. I argue, by contrast, that the paradoxes arise from a confusion of what it expresses caused by cognitive biases. The material conditional properly belongs to the class of indicative, not…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-03-13","reactions":{}}