{"id":"arxiv/2603.16213","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16213","tags":["math.ST","stat.ME"],"score":0,"title":"Equivalence testing with data-dependent and post-hoc equivalence margins","domain":"math.ST","source":"arxiv","authors":["Stan Koobs","Nick W. Koning"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.ST","summary":"Equivalence testing compares the hypothesis that an effect $μ$ is large against the alternative that it is negligible. Here, `large' is classically expressed as being larger than some `equivalence margin' $Δ$. A longstanding problem is that this margin must be specified but can rarely be objectively justified in practice. We lay the foundation for an alternative paradigm, arguing to instead report a data-dependent margin $\\widehatΔ_α$ that bounds the true effect $μ$ with probability $1 - α$. Our key argument is that $\\widehatΔ_α$ is more useful than a test outcome at a fixed margin $Δ$, as…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-03-17","reactions":{}}