{"id":"arxiv/2603.18160","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18160","tags":["math.NA"],"score":0,"title":"On the equivalence of semi-discrete Active Flux and Discontinuous Galerkin methods and a comparison of their performance","domain":"math.NA","source":"arxiv","authors":["Wasilij Barsukow","Christian Klingenberg","Simon Krotsch"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.NA","summary":"The Active Flux (AF) method employs a globally continuous approximation, like continuous Finite Element methods. This is achieved through the placement of point values at cell interfaces which are shared between adjacent cells. With, on average, K+1 degrees of freedom per cell, Active Flux achieves a polynomial approximation of degree K+1, while the Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method uses only polynomials of degree K, i.e. one degree less with the same number of degrees of freedom. Despite all the differences, in this paper we show, however, that for linear problems in one and several…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-03-18","reactions":{}}