{"id":"arxiv/2603.19215","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19215","tags":["math.AG","cs.AI","cs.HC","math.NT"],"score":0,"title":"$R$-equivalence on Cubic Surfaces I: Existing Cases with Non-Trivial Universal Equivalence","domain":"math.AG","source":"arxiv","authors":["Dimitri Kanevsky","Julian Salazar","Matt Harvey"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.AG","summary":"Let $V$ be a smooth cubic surface over a $p$-adic field $k$ with good reduction. Swinnerton-Dyer (1981) proved that $R$-equivalence is trivial on $V(k)$ except perhaps if $V$ is one of three special types--those whose $R$-equivalence he could not bound by proving the universal (admissible) equivalence is trivial. We consider all surfaces $V$ currently known to have non-trivial universal equivalence. Beyond being intractable to Swinnerton-Dyer's approach, we observe that if these surfaces also had non-trivial $R$-equivalence, they would contradict Colliot-Thélène and Sansuc's conjecture…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-03-19","reactions":{}}