{"id":"arxiv/2603.29970","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29970","tags":["math.NT"],"score":0,"title":"ABC implies that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes","domain":"math.NT","source":"arxiv","authors":["David Kurniadi Angdinata","Evan Chen","Chris Cummins","Ben Eltschig","Dejan Grubisic","Leopold Haller","Letong Hong","Andranik Kurghinyan","Kenny Lau","Hugh Leather","Seewoo Lee","Simon Mahns","Aram H. Markosyan","Rithikesh Muddana","Ken Ono","Manooshree Patel","Gaurang Pendharkar","Vedant Rathi","Alex Schneidman","Volker Seeker","Shubho Sengupta","Ishan Sinha","Jimmy Xin","Jujian Zhang"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.NT","summary":"Lehmer conjectured that Ramanujan's tau-function never vanishes. In a related direction, a folklore conjecture asserts that infinitely many primes arise as absolute values of Ramanujan's tau-function. Recently, Xiong showed that these prime values form a subset of the primes with density at most $2/11$. Assuming the $abc$ Conjecture, we prove the stronger upper bound \\[ S(X):=\\#\\{\\ell\\le X:\\ \\ell\\ \\text{prime and } |τ(n)|=\\ell \\text{ for some } n\\ge 1\\} = O(X^{13/22}), \\] which implies that Ramanujan's tau-function misses a density 1 subset of the primes. We give a heuristic suggesting that…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-03-31","reactions":{}}