{"id":"arxiv/2604.08482","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08482","tags":["math.OC","math.PR"],"score":0,"title":"Collective deterrence as a classification problem: Voting rules, deterrence credibility, and escalation risk","domain":"math.OC","source":"arxiv","authors":["Torgeir Aambø"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.OC","summary":"Deterrence coalitions that collectively own their deterrence technology, need an institutional design to decide when to retaliate against an attack or incident. This choice of institutional design, formalized through a social choice function, introduces a tradeoff between credible deterrence and escalation risk. We study this tradeoff via a simple signalling model, and use it to construct an associated binary classification problem to determine institutional designs that perform well in a variety of environments. For a small coalition of four members, we compute and study the statistics of…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-04-09","reactions":{}}