{"id":"arxiv/2604.08622","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08622","tags":["hep-lat","quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Comments on \"Ether of Orbifolds\"","domain":"hep-lat","source":"arxiv","authors":["Masanori Hanada"],"reviews":0,"subject":"hep-lat","summary":"We comment on a recent manuscript \"Ether of Orbifolds\" by Henry Lamm. In the first version, it was mistakenly claimed that the orbifold lattice Hamiltonian is not gauge invariant, and a quantity $ε_g$, which has nothing to do with a non-existent \"gauge violation\", was introduced. The scaling of this $ε_g$ was used to claim a huge simulation cost. In fact, $ε_g$ characterizes the shift of the effective lattice spacing -- because, in the orbifold lattice formulation, the lattice is generated dynamically from the vacuum expectation value of the complex matrices. In the second version, the claim…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-04-09","reactions":{}}