{"id":"arxiv/2604.17039","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17039","tags":["math.LO"],"score":0,"title":"Characterizing relative decidability in terms of model completeness","domain":"math.LO","source":"arxiv","authors":["Matthew Harrison-Trainor","Liam Tan"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.LO","summary":"A theory $T$ is said to be relatively decidable if for every model of $T$, one can compute the elementary diagram of that model from its atomic diagram together with $T$. We verify a conjecture of Chubb, Miller, and Solomon by showing that for complete theories $T$, $T$ is relatively decidable if and only if $T$ has a conservative model complete extension of the form $T \\cup \\{\\varphi(\\bar{c})\\}$ where $T \\models \\exists \\bar{x} \\; \\varphi(\\bar{x})$. We also show that no such characterization works for incomplete theories.","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-04-18","reactions":{}}