{"id":"arxiv/2604.25884","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25884","tags":["quant-ph","cs.CV"],"score":0,"title":"QCalEval: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Quantum Calibration Plot Understanding","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Shuxiang Cao","Zijian Zhang","Abhishek Agarwal","Grace Bratrud","Niyaz R. Beysengulov","Daniel C. Cole","Alejandro Gómez Frieiro","Elena O. Glen","Hao Hsu","Gang Huang","Raymond Jow","Greshma Shaji","Tom Lubowe","Ligeng Zhu","Luis Mantilla Calderón","Nicola Pancotti","Joel Pendleton","Brandon Severin","Charles Etienne Staub","Sara Sussman","Antti Vepsäläinen","Neel Rajeshbhai Vora","Yilun Xu","Varinia Bernales","Daniel Bowring","Elica Kyoseva","Ivan Rungger","Giulia Semeghini","Sam Stanwyck","Timothy Costa","Alán Aspuru-Guzik","Krysta Svore"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Quantum computing calibration depends on interpreting experimental data, and calibration plots provide the most universal human-readable representation for this task, yet no systematic evaluation exists of how well vision-language models (VLMs) interpret them. We introduce QCalEval, the first VLM benchmark for quantum calibration plots: 243 samples across 87 scenario types from 22 experiment families, spanning superconducting qubits and neutral atoms, evaluated on six question types in both zero-shot and in-context learning settings. The best general-purpose zero-shot model reaches a mean…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-04-28","reactions":{}}