{"id":"arxiv/2605.13154","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13154","tags":["quant-ph","math.ST"],"score":0,"title":"Three ways to find comfort with the Bell proof and the results of the Bell experiments","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Richard D Gill","Inge S. Helland","Bart Jongejan"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Bell's theorem states that no description of a Bell experiment can be simultaneously local, realistic in the sense of counterfactual definiteness, and free of conspiracy between settings and hidden state. The recent generation of experiments has confirmed the predicted violation of the CHSH inequality, so one of the assumptions must be abandoned. Which one, and how one reconstructs a coherent worldview after doing so, is a question on which many authors disagree. This paper is written by three such authors. All three reject both counterfactual definiteness and conspiratorial violation of…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-05-13","reactions":{}}