{"id":"arxiv/2605.29589","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29589","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Geoff Beck"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"The empirical proof of Bell inequality violations was a landmark moment for research into quantum foundations. It commits us to a universe without strict relativistic locality or requires that we escape through a potential loophole like many-worlds or superdeterminism. In this work, we consider a sequential, single-spin experiment whose auto-correlations match the two-spin entangled correlations of a Bell scenario. We use a counterfactual equivalence between the two to argue that Bell-type correlations are actually just a different implementation of the sequential experiment. This comports…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-05-28","reactions":{}}