{"id":"arxiv/2605.31330","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31330","tags":["cs.GT","cs.AI","cs.MA","math.OC","nlin.AO"],"score":0,"title":"Social welfare optimisation under institutional reward and punishment","domain":"cs.GT","source":"arxiv","authors":["Van An Nguyen","Vuong Khang Huynh","Huu Loi Bui","Hai Anh Ha","Quang Dung Le","Tan Dat Nguyen","Ngoc Ngu Nguyen","Zhao Song","Manh Hong Duong","Le Hong Trang","The Anh Han"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.GT","summary":"Institutional incentives are widely used to promote cooperation among autonomous, self-regarding agents, from human societies to multi-agent and AI systems. Existing work typically treats incentive design as a bi-objective problem: minimise institutional cost while achieving a high long-run frequency of cooperation. Whether such schemes also maximise social welfare - total population payoff net of institutional expenditure - has remained largely unexplored. We develop a welfare-centric framework for institutional incentives in finite, well-mixed populations playing a social dilemma (Donation…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-05-29","reactions":{}}