{"id":"arxiv/2607.24901","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24901","tags":["physics.hist-ph","hep-th"],"score":0,"title":"The geometry-first formulation of gauge theory is not equivalent to the symmetry-first one","domain":"physics.hist-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Henrique Gomes"],"reviews":0,"subject":"physics.hist-ph","summary":"This paper argues that the geometry-first and symmetry-first formulations of gauge theory are not equivalent. They differ in three respects. First, the geometry-first formulation---in which gauge groups arise as automorphism groups of structured fundamental vector bundles---admits fewer theories when its generating structures are restricted to finite tensorial data. Charged theories with additive structure group $\\mathbb{R}$ have no such presentation. Second, even when a symmetry-first theory has a geometry-first presentation, its principal bundle and matter bundles do not determine which…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-07-27","reactions":{}}