{"id":"arxiv/2608.07578","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07578","tags":["math.LO","cs.LO"],"score":0,"title":"A Comment on Modal Collapse and Ultrafilters in Gödel's Ontological Argument","domain":"math.LO","source":"arxiv","authors":["Christoph Benzmüller"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.LO","summary":"Gödel's ontological argument is modal by design. Possibility and necessity are among its central concerns, and connected interpretation decisions -- extensions or intensions for the positive properties, constant or varying quantifier domains, the choice of modal logic, etc. -- subtly shape the argument and, in particular, whether the modal collapse is implied or not. It is tempting to abstract the modality away and to read the positive properties as merely forming an ultrafilter -- which, however, may replace Gödel's argument with a perhaps more manageable alternative that may have little to…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-04","reactions":{}}