{"id":"arxiv/2608.10006","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10006","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"On quantum mechanics self-consistency: EPR incompleteness claims require no extraneous concepts beyond the theory's plain formalism for refutation","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["D. F. Orsini","L. R. N. Oliveira","M. G. E. da Luz"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"From a phenomenological and experimental viewpoint, quantum mechanics is remarkably successful in explaining effects and processes in the microscopic world. Recently, however, a growing body of literature has revisited the theory's own formal foundations, specifically addressing issues of self-consistency and completeness. As a major historical example of these foundational challenges, the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument famously claimed that the theory is incomplete. While many valid criticisms and refutations of the EPR logic exist, they generally rely on a combination of technical…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-07","reactions":{}}