{"id":"arxiv/2609.02072","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02072","tags":["math.NA","math.AP","math.OC","math.PR"],"score":0,"title":"Two Adjoint Perspectives on Fokker-Planck Optimization: A Microscopic-Macroscopic Correspondence","domain":"math.NA","source":"arxiv","authors":["Kathrin Hellmuth","Qin Li","Yunan Yang"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.NA","summary":"The Fokker-Planck equation admits both a macroscopic Eulerian description through probability densities and a microscopic Lagrangian description through stochastic trajectories. Consequently, optimization problems constrained by the Fokker-Planck equation can be formulated from either perspective. Surprisingly, the corresponding adjoint equations appear to be fundamentally different: the macroscopic adjoint is governed by the backward Kolmogorov equation, whereas the microscopic adjoint evolves pathwise along stochastic trajectories. In this note, we reconcile these two formulations by…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-09-02","reactions":{}}