{"id":"arxiv/2609.12146","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12146","tags":["quant-ph","cs.ET","cs.PF"],"score":0,"title":"Benchmarking the computational power of quantum computers","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Timothy Proctor","Oliver Hart","Oliver Widzowski Maupin","Matthew Girling","Daniel Hothem","Daniel Mills","Jordan Hines","Karl Mayer","Jacob S. Nelson","Tyler LeBlond","Zohim Chandani","Diego Forlivesi","Piper C. Wysocki","Boldizsár Poór","Joan M. Dreiling","Annie Park","Adam P. Reed","Brian Estey","Cameron Foltz","Akhil Isanaka","M. S. Allman","Michael Mills","Maxwell D. Urmey","Peter E. Siegfried","Audrey Faricy","Jin-Sung Kim","Cristina Cîrstoiu","Andrew D. Baczewski","Charles H. Baldwin","Robin Blume-Kohout"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Quantum computing hardware is advancing rapidly toward utility-scale machines that will enable scientific breakthroughs. Many teams are pursuing distinct and difficult-to-compare routes to this goal, using different qubit technologies and logical architectures. Tracking progress toward quantum utility therefore requires rigorous benchmarks that measure computational capability relative to utility-scale challenge problems and enable fair comparison across disparate platforms. Here we demonstrate direct, cross-platform measurement of quantum computational capability using a new benchmark that…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-09-10","reactions":{}}