{"id":"arxiv/2609.22321","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22321","tags":["math.HO"],"score":0,"title":"Toward Well-Posed Problems in the Social Sciences: Hadamard's Criteria as Epistemic Guardrails","domain":"math.HO","source":"arxiv","authors":["Don Li"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.HO","summary":"We develop an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the epistemic robustness of social-scientific inquiry through Hadamard's criteria for well-posed problems: existence, uniqueness, and stability. Reinterpreting these criteria not as demands for deterministic certainty but as methodological guardrails, we show how they diagnose recurrent failures of identification and inference across quantitative and qualitative paradigms. In quantitative research (e.g., econometric modeling), instability manifests when substantive conclusions depend sensitively on model specifications or data…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-09-15","reactions":{}}