{"id":"arxiv/2609.27765","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27765","tags":["math.ST","cs.IT","cs.LG","math.PR","stat.ML"],"score":0,"title":"The Type-II Error of Test Supermartingales: e-Power versus the Chernoff-Stein Exponent","domain":"math.ST","source":"arxiv","authors":["Patrick Forré"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.ST","summary":"In safe hypothesis testing with test supermartingales, Ville's inequality provides anytime-valid type-I error guarantees for every significance level $α\\in(0,1]$, if one rejects the null hypothesis whenever the wealth process first exceeds $1/α$. Due to an inherent asymmetry, the type-II error behaves differently. We prove two things about the latter, for a simple null and alternative. First, the mean growth rate $\\mathbb{E}_{P_1}[\\log E]$, the e-power, that Kelly betting and growth-rate-optimal e-variables maximise, bounds nothing on its own. For every level $c>0$, every $α$ and horizon $t$…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-19","reactions":{}}