{"id":"arxiv/2609.27766","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27766","tags":["math.ST","cs.IT","cs.LG","math.PR","stat.ML"],"score":0,"title":"Type-II Error Bounds for Test Supermartingales from Lower-Tail Hypotheses","domain":"math.ST","source":"arxiv","authors":["Patrick Forré"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.ST","summary":"In safe hypothesis testing with test supermartingals, Ville's inequality provides anytime-valid type-I error guarantees for every significance level $α\\in(0,1]$, if one rejects the null hypothesis whenever the wealth process first exceeds $\\frac{1}α$. Due to an inherent asymmetry, the type-II error does not have such guarantees: a heavy concentration of the probability on the lower tail of the log-increments can lead to one catastrophic bet that undoes any amount of accumulated evidence. This paper studies how different hypotheses on those lower-tail probabilities lead to different bounds on…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-19","reactions":{}}