{"id":"arxiv/2610.02641","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02641","tags":["quant-ph","cs.CR","cs.LG"],"score":0,"title":"When Normalization Selects the Sign: Auditing Robustness Ablations in Quantum Attention","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Owen Friedewald","Srikar Alla","Ali Shiri Sichani","Chi-Ren Shyu"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Removing an input-scaling module changes both a classifier and the perturbations reaching its encoder. A robustness difference can therefore reflect the comparison rule as well as the module. We demonstrate this problem in a four-qubit quantum-attention detector on generated power-grid trajectories. A learned scaling module appears beneficial at a fixed physical attack budget, but matching an upper bound on perturbations at the encoder reverses the ordering. Neither comparison alone establishes a robustness benefit caused by the module. The initial test also perturbs clean examples into…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-02","reactions":{}}