Open Research Index

A Borel graphable equivalence relation with no Borel graphing of diameter two

Patrick Lutz

arXivarxiv/2601.04417Jan 7, 2026math.LOscore 0

We answer a question of Arant, Kechris and Lutz by showing that there is a Borel graphable equivalence relation with no Borel graphing of diameter less than 3. More specifically, we prove that there is an equivalence relation with a Borel graphing of diameter at most 4 but no Borel graphing of diameter less than 3. Our proof relies on a technical lemma about computability-theoretic genericity, which may have other applications.

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2601.04417
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2601.04417/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2601.04417/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'