Uniqueness of the Canonical Reciprocal Cost
We study a rigidity problem for functions \(F:\R_{>0}\to\R_{\ge 0}\) that penalize deviation of a positive ratio from equilibrium \(x=1\). Assuming (i) a d'Alembert-type composition law on \(\R_{>0}\), and (ii) a single quadratic calibration at the identity (in logarithmic coordinates), we prove that \(F\) is uniquely determined. The composition law implies the normalization $F(1)=0.$ The unique solution is called the canonical reciprocal cost, namely the difference between the arithmetic and geometric means of \(x\) and its reciprocal. Our proof uses the logarithmic coordinates…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.05753
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.05753/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.05753/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'