Erasure Thresholds for Hyperbolic and Semi-Hyperbolic Surface Codes
We extend the circuit-level erasure noise model and Wang et al.\ quadratic expansion fitting of Chang et al.\ from planar surface codes to hyperbolic CSS surface codes. Under Chang et al.'s noise models, the $\{8,3\}$ Bolza fine-grained family threshold reaches $3.6\%$ under the general-Pauli models (which coincide at temporal resolution $η= 1$) and $4.7\%$ under the tailored spatially perfect model at $R_e = 1$ (pure erasure). The corresponding erasure-to-Pauli ratios ($5.0\times$ and $6.5\times$) match the surface code values to within $5\%$. Per-observable crossing-point analysis at $R_e…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.10423
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.10423/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.10423/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'