Open Research Index

Detecting Where Effects Occur by Testing Hypotheses in Order

Jake Bowers, David Kim, Nuole Chen

arXivarxiv/2602.21068Feb 24, 2026stat.MEscore 0

Experimental evaluations of public policies often randomize a new intervention within many sites or blocks. After an overall statistically significant result is reported, the natural question from a policy maker is: \emph{where} did effects occur? Standard adjustments for multiple testing answer this question with little power because they ignore how the experiment is organized: blocks nest within cohorts, sites, and districts. We organize the hypotheses in the shape of a tree that follows this administrative structure and test them top-down, stopping at any branch where the null is not…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.21068
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.21068/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2602.21068/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'