Open Research Index

Shadowing and Lipschitz Shadowing in Symbolic Dynamics: Finite vs. Infinite Alphabets

Daniel Gonçalves, Sofia Meneghel Silva

arXivarxiv/2603.03200Mar 3, 2026math.DSscore 0

We point out a basic dichotomy between the shadowing and Lipschitz shadowing properties for one-sided shift spaces in two infinite-alphabet frameworks: the classical product-topology model $X\subseteq A^{\mathbb{N}}$ and the compact Ott--Tomforde--Willis (OTW) model obtained by adjoining finite words. In the product-topology setting, for the natural class of prefix ultrametrics, shadowing and Lipschitz shadowing coincide. However, since $A^{\mathbb{N}}$ is non-compact when $A$ is countably infinite, it remains unclear whether Lipschitz shadowing is stable under arbitrary uniformly equivalent…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.03200
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.03200/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.03200/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'