Open Research Index

Evaluation artifacts in reversible quantum reservoir protocols: a withdrawal of our own claims, and an entangled channel that survives the controls

Hikaru Wakaura, Taiki Tanimae

arXivarxiv/2603.12303Mar 12, 2026quant-phscore 0

This replaces v1, which reported a ten-order shot-noise suppression from a quantum reservoir autoencoder and a two-phase protocol reconstructing unseen inputs at MSE ~ 10^-4. We withdraw both claims: under one consistent evaluation the suppression reverses sign (reset channels degrade reconstruction 144x), the two-phase target is invertible in closed form without training, and a polynomial using no quantum features matches the full model. We trace these to four evaluation artifacts; the fourth also invalidates the companion latent code, which never leaves its initialization. What survives…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.12303
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.12303/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.12303/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'