A correspondence problem for mathematical proof
Mathematical proofs are often said to justify their conclusions by indicating the existence of a corresponding formal derivation. We argue that this widespread view relies on an under-examined notion of correspondence, or what it means for a particular derivation to ''correspond'' to a particular proof. Mere existence of a formalization is not enough, and a substantive account of the required correspondence resolves into two criteria -- adequate representation (of the original theorem) and tracking (of the steps in the original proof). An examination of the actually-existing formalization…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.13680
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.13680/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.13680/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'