Canonical Brackets, (Anti-)BRST Invariant Charges and Physicality Criteria: Non-Abelian 1-Form Gauge Theory
In the case of a D-dimensional non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory (without any interaction with the matter fields), we show that the application of the Noether theorem does not lead to the derivations of the Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) and anti-BRST charges that obey (i) the (anti-)BRST invariance, and (ii) the nilpotency property (unless we exploit the theoretical strength of $(a)$ the partial integration along with the Gauss divergence theorem, and $(b)$ use the appropriate equations of motion at suitable places). This happens because of the presence of a non-trivial Curci-Ferrari (CF)…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.24514
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.24514/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.24514/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'