Open Research Index

Remarks on "Further comments on "Rebuttal of "Refutation of "Comment on "Reply to "Comments on "A genuinely natural information measure" " " " " " "

Z. Sommer, A. Winter

arXivarxiv/2603.28975Mar 30, 2026math-phscore 0

It's a bit tedious, but as John Doe and Jean Roe have insisted on offering further comments on our comprehensive refutation of the former's already tiringly obstinate advances, we feel compelled to review their not even wrong opinions once again, hoping to put some sense back into the discourse.

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.28975
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.28975/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.28975/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'