A counterexample to the conjecture on Biclique Partition number of Split Graphs and related problems
The biclique partition number of a graph \(G\), denoted \( \operatorname{bp}(G)\), is the minimum number of biclique subgraphs needed to partition the edge set of $G$. Lyu and Hicks \cite{lyu2023finding} posed the open problem of whether \( \operatorname{bp}(G) = \operatorname{mc}(G^c) - 1 \) holds for every co-chordal graph or split graph, where \( \operatorname{mc}(G^c) \) denotes the number of maximal cliques in the complement of \( G \). Such a result would extend the celebrated Graham--Pollak theorem to a more general class of graphs. In this note, we answer this problem in the negative…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.05491
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.05491/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.05491/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'