Open Research Index

Oblivious Subspace Injection Is Not Enough for Relative Error

Alex Townsend, Chris Wang

arXivarxiv/2604.10215Apr 11, 2026math.NAscore 0

Oblivious subspace injection (OSI) was introduced by Camaño, Epperly, Meyer, and Tropp in 2025 as a much weaker sketching property than oblivious subspace embedding (OSE) that still yields constant-factor guarantees for randomized low-rank approximation and sketch-and-solve least-squares regression. At the Simons Institute in Berkeley during a workshop in October 2025, it was asked whether OSIs also imply relative error bounds rather than just constant-factor guarantees. We show that, from a theoretical standpoint, OSI alone does not yield OSE-style relative-error guarantees whose failure…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.10215
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.10215/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.10215/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'