Counterexamples to a Conjecture on Laplacian Ratios of Trees
For a graph \(G\) with no isolated vertices, its Laplacian ratio is defined as \[ π(G)=\frac{\operatorname{per}(L(G))}{\prod_{v\in V(G)} d(v)}, \] where \(L(G)\) is the Laplacian matrix of \(G\), \(d(v)\) is the degree of \(v\), and \(\operatorname{per}\) denotes the permanent. Brualdi and Goldwasser asked for the maximum value of \(π(T)\) among trees \(T\) with a fixed number of vertices. Wu, Dong and Lai recently proposed a conjectural answer to this problem. We give infinite families of counterexamples to their conjecture.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.14176
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.14176/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.14176/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'