Classification aggregation: a quantitative impossibility theorem
A group of individuals wishes to classify $m$ objects into $n$ categories in such a way that no class is left empty, a condition known as surjectivity. The opinions of the individuals are aggregated separately for each object using an aggregation function that can depend on the object. Maniquet and Mongin showed that if the aggregation functions are unanimous and the outcome must always be surjective, then the aggregation mechanism is dictatorial. Cailloux et al. showed that the same holds even if unanimity is relaxed to citizen sovereignty (each object can be classified into any category).…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.17136
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.17136/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.17136/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'