Claim against Measurement: Statistical Artefacts in Quantum Error Mitigation Benchmarks
QEM is widely regarded as a plausible bridge from NISQ devices to FTQC. Yet the empirical studies used to assess the effectiveness of QEM techniques on concrete problems have received comparatively little scrutiny with respect to the validity of their conclusions. We systematically review 81 recent QEM papers using an eight-criterion framework covering statistical rigour, reproducibility, and reporting quality. Among the applicable papers, only 15 (25%) use inferential methods, while 25 (42%) report uncertainty only descriptively, without testing whether the claimed effects are statistically…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.29872
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.29872/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2605.29872/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'