Delphi.science

Inequivalence of the various notions of completeness for Cartan geometries

Jacob W. Erickson, Benjamin McKay

arXivarxiv/2606.00354May 29, 2026math.DGscore 0

We demonstrate that the three prevailing notions of completeness for Cartan geometries are not actually equivalent and provide methods for constructing many examples in the affine case, modernizing and extending results due to Yeaton Clifton. In an effort to rectify the folklore on the topic, we also provide detailed explanations of how specious proofs in the literature that would claim that these types of completeness are equivalent break down.

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.00354
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.00354/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.00354/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'