A Proof in Coq that Core Logic is not Paraconsistent
Tennant claims that his Core logic $\mathbb{C}$ is paraconsistent. It means that the sequent of the First Lewis Paradox, i.e. $\lnot A, A \vdash B$ is declared false, and its corresponding antisequent, called `Claim~1', i.e. $\lnot A, A \nvdash B$ true, as in minimal logic $\mathbf{M}$. This paper proves that Claim~1 entails a contradiction in $\mathbb{C}$, so that, to preserve consistency, the Core logician must reject the claim that his system is paraconsistent. The proof is purely logical, in four steps within a five-rule fragment $\mathcal{F}$ of $\mathbb{C}$ and its refutation system in…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.05953
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.05953/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.05953/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'