A remark on diagnosability verification
We point out three inaccuracies in paper [M.V. Moreira, T.C. Jesus, and J.C. Basilio. Polynomial time verification of decentralized diagnosability of discrete event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56(7):1679-1684, July 2011]. First, the authors wrongly claimed that their algorithm for verifying (co-)diagnosability of labeled finite-state automata (LFSAs) did not depend on assumptions. We give an LFSA that is not deadlock-free or divergence-free such that their algorithm cannot correctly verify its diagnosability. Because diagnosability is a special case of co-diagnosability,…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.07701
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.07701/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.07701/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'