On converse invariant trees of diameter four
Let $D$ be an oriented graph, and let $f_T(D)$ denote the number of copies of $D$ in a tournament $T$. We say that $D$ is \emph{converse invariant} if $f_T(D)=f_T(\overline D)$ for every tournament $T$, where $\overline D$ is obtained from $D$ by reversing all arcs. Ai, Gutin, Lei, Yeo, and Zhou introduced a digraph polynomial for studying this property and conjectured that an orientation of a tree of maximum degree at least $3$ is converse invariant if and only if it is self-converse or can be obtained recursively by bridge-mirroring from an orientation of a path. We disprove this…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.24739
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.24739/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.24739/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'