Comment on "Ideal clocks -- a convenient fiction" by K. Lorek et al
We correct a subtle oversight in Eq.(19) of K. Lorek et al. [Class. Quantum Grav. 32 175003 (2015)] concerning the decay probability of a uniformly accelerated quantum clock. The original expression included unphysical cross-wedge term ($|\barγ_{K 1}|^2$) violating the spatial separation of Rindler wedges. We derive the corrected probability using the paper's Rindler conformal coordinates $(τ, ξ)$, retaining only causally consistent thermal terms, and discuss implications for relativistic clock models.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.00059
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.00059/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.00059/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'