A counterexample for the Daugavet index of thickness in $\ell_1$-sums
We give a negative answer to a question of Haller-Langemets-Lima-Nadel-Rueda Zoca asking whether, for all Banach spaces $X$ and $Y$, the Daugavet index of thickness satisfies \[ T(X\oplus_1 Y)=\min\{T(X),T(Y)\}. \] We show that this equality does hold whenever one of the two summands has the Daugavet property. On the other hand, if $D$ is a Banach space with the Daugavet property and $N$ is a suitable absolute norm, then for $X=D\oplus_N D$, one has $T(X\oplus_1 X)<T(X)$.
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.02227
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.02227/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.02227/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'