Decision Kernels for Quantum Error Mitigation: Why Accuracy Gains Need Not Improve Downstream Decisions
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is usually benchmarked by expectation-value accuracy, but many near-term workflows use those values only to make downstream choices such as argmin selection, ranking, top-k filtering, optimizer-step acceptance, or phase labeling. This creates a structural mismatch: accuracy is measured in the ambient landscape space, whereas shift-invariant decisions depend only on gaps. We develop a quotient-space theory of finite-shot QEM for downstream decisions. The minimal decision-complete object is the residual gap law; in Gaussian finite-shot regimes it is summarized by…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.02888
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.02888/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.02888/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'