Open Research Index

How NOT to build control-target gates in semiconductor quantum dots and beyond

Roman Korol, John Nichol, Ignacio Franco

arXivarxiv/2608.00733Aug 1, 2026cond-mat.mes-hallscore 0

Universal quantum computation requires single-qubit control together with at least one entangling two-qubit gate. CNOT and CROT gates are two famous examples of such gates, wherein the state of one qubit (control) dictates the transformation applied to the other (target). By using a simple derivation motivated by symmetry, we show that current device architectures of semiconductor-based quantum dot devices prevent efficient implementation of a CNOT and other asymmetric control-target gates via Heisenberg exchange, Coulomb repulsion, or other interaction that is invariant under spin exchange.…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.00733
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.00733/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.00733/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'