A congruence obstruction to Roman's bound for Zarankiewicz numbers
Let z(m,n;s,t) be the largest number of ones in an m x n zero-one matrix with no s x t all-ones submatrix. Roman's 1975 inequality remains the best general upper bound for s>=3, but it is not attained on a large part of the range just below the design threshold T=(t-1)C(m,s)/(s+1). The proof has two steps. First, for n=T-c with 1 s*sigma(r). The first case is an odd-s phenomenon confined to one residue class, giving order-m^s values of n; the second needs mu != 0 but covers the whole interval once m exceeds a threshold depending only on s and mu. For s=4, t=2, m=28 it covers all 2730 values…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.07607
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.07607/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.07607/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'