Open Research Index

Algorithmic Asymmetry in Zero-Sum Games: Unilateral Recovery of Fast Convergence Against a Slow Opponent

James P. Bailey, Soham Das

arXivarxiv/2608.09780Aug 10, 2026cs.GTscore 0

Learning dynamics in zero-sum games are typically analyzed under algorithmic symmetry: both agents use the same update rule, or methods from a common algorithmic family. This is at odds with the nature of zero-sum games; competing agents need not coordinate on algorithm selection. This paper studies algorithmic asymmetry in learning dynamics in zero-sum games. In particular, we ask whether fast convergence can be recovered when one agent is fixed to vanilla gradient descent, whose standard regret-based analysis certifies, at best, $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ ergodic convergence. We show that the slow…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.09780
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.09780/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.09780/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'