Open Research Index

Height lower bounds for elements of highly composite rings

Siu Hang Man, Niclas Technau, Martin Widmer, Pavlo Yatsyna

arXivarxiv/2608.11904Aug 12, 2026math.NTscore 0

Let $\mathbb{Q}^{(d)}$ be the composite field of all number fields of degree at most $d$. In 2001 Bombieri and Zannier proved that $\mathbb{Q}^{(2)}$ has the Northcott property and asked what happens for $d\geq 3$. Here we study the absolute Weil height for elements in the composite ring of the rings of integers of such number fields. In particular, we consider $\mathbb{Q}^{(3)}$ as the composite field of $\mathbb{Q}^{(2)}$ and a minimal infinite family of cubic fields, and we show that the composite ring of the rings of integers of these fields does have the Northcott property. Our results…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.11904
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.11904/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.11904/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'